A
Tax Too Far
Just three years before the signing of the Declaration of
Independence, a group of liberty lovers made quite the ruckus about a tax on
tea. Flash-forward to the present, and as Americans we are used to being
taxed on just about everything. Our houses? Taxed. Our income? Taxed. Our Internet? Not yet, but they sure are trying. I
know we can agree that taxes are necessary for the functions of our military,
and other necessary (key word) programs. What is not necessary
is our tax system.
John
Locke’s “The Second Treatise of Government” persuaded many concepts within our
founding documents. One concept that we all know (and hopefully love) is
“property rights”. Locke believed that when we mix our labor with the Earth,
the product is an extension of us, and therefore belongs to us. It is no
different than our arm or leg. “The labor of his body and the work of his hands
we may say are properly his” [1]. John Adams said, “The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as
sacred as the laws of God ... anarchy and tyranny commence. PROPERTY MUST BE
SECURED OR LIBERTY CANNOT EXIST”[2]. So you see, the very founding of this
wonderful nation held that property rights were of the utmost importance. We
have a misconception that property rights extend as far as our homes,
but it actually goes much further than that.
When you go to work, what is it that you are actually doing? I will argue that you are mixing your labor with the Earth, and the product is your paycheck. Because after all, we have evolved from the times of building mud huts and eating fruit off of our own trees. “The labor put a distinction between them and the common… and so they became his private right” [3]. Your paycheck is your property. If we are following Locke’s argument, then we have allowed the unthinkable: the government is taxing an extension of the people. Not only is your property taken from you, they chop it up and give you back part of what was rightfully yours a year later. Sounds pretty cruel and inhumane if you ask me.
We
must regain our property and our liberty, and repeal the federal income tax
from the Revenue Act of 1913. If this idea makes you feel uncomfortable, it’s
only because we have been brainwashed to believe that there is no other way to
be taxed, such as a flat-tax (which is a case for another day). Real reform
does not happen by changing the income brackets in the current tax system. If
the federal government can create reforms for industries like health care and
education (for the worst if you ask me), then reforming the tax system should
not be seen as a “far out” idea, especially when it combats our founding
documents so clearly. Instead of climbing a ship and throwing off boxes of tea,
we can rally in the form of electing the right people who see the flaw in the
current tax system. We must also send a warning to current elected officials
that if they don’t start doing something about it, they won’t be holding their
office for very long. It is time to take the tax back that went too far.
In
Liberty,
Ivy
El-Zaatari
Bibliography:
Locke,
John, and J. W. Gough. The
Second Treatise of Civil Government and A Letter concerning Toleration,.
Oxford: B. Blackwell, 1946.
2Adams,
John. A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States
of America By John Adams ... London: Printed for C. Dilly, 1787.
[1] Locke, John, and J. W. Gough. The Second Treatise of Civil Government and A
Letter concerning Toleration,. Oxford: B. Blackwell, 1946.
2Adams, John. A Defence of the Constitutions of
Government of the United States of America By John Adams ... London:
Printed for C. Dilly, 1787.
3Locke, John, and J. W. Gough. The Second Treatise of Civil Government and A
Letter concerning Toleration,. Oxford: B. Blackwell, 1946.